Single Subject Lesson Design
- Box Format
1.
TITLE
OF THE LESSON
Laboratory Inquiry – Pascal’s Principle
|
2.
CURRICULUM
AREA & GRADE LEVEL
Physics, Grade 9-12
|
3A.
STUDENT INFORMATION: English Language Learners
Elena is a 15 year old 10th grader. She is identified as
an ELL with a CELDT level of 4 whose primary language is Spanish. She
comes form a middle class family and has 2 older brothers, one of which also
attends RBV, and a younger sister. Her parents are second generation
immigrants and her family speaks a mixture of Spanish and English at home.
Her parents are active on the schools PTSA. Elena does not read or
write in Spanish. Her performance in school is good if not
excellent. Her reading, writing and math skills are all at grade level.
She does, however, excel in Art and Music classes and is a member of
the school choir. She reports that her favorite spare time activities
are dancing and singing. Elena is vivacious and outgoing, prefers to
work in small groups as opposed to whole-class or individual activities.
She easily gravitates to a leadership role in small group activities
but does have a tendency to take the group off task.
Ibram is 16 years old in the 11th grade. His CELDT level
is 3 and his primary language is Arabic. His family immigrated fairly
recently and he has been in the California school system for 3 years.
He comes from an upper middle class family and is the youngest of three
children. His oldest sibling, a brother, did not emigrate with his
family and his older sister attends a local community college. His
family speaks Arabic almost exclusively at home, primarily because, while his
father is fluent in English, his mother speaks no English at all. Ibram
enjoys sports, particularly soccer, but does not play on a school
team. He gets very good grades; all A's but one B on his last report.
His parents have high expectations for his schoolwork but offer little
concrete support. Ibram is shy and tends to isolate. He reports
that because of his language and cultural differences he does not feel that
he fits in well in school.
Maria is a 14 year old girl in the 9th grade and is identified
as an ELL with a CELDT level of 3 and a primary language of Spanish.
Her father is a first generation immigrant and her mother second
generation. They speak mostly Spanish at home. She has one older
sibling who also attends RBV. Her family is middle class to lower
middle class. Her parents own and operate a small convenience/grocery
store where Maria works after school and on weekends.
Maria's CELDT score is much higher for reading than for writing
and she reads extensively, preferring romantic and fantasy fiction. She
enjoys sports and loves to play soccer but has little time to do so. Maria
if quiet and shy but friendly. She works well in small groups but
seldom takes on a leadership role, even when encouraged to do so.
|
3B.
STUDENT INFORMATION: Students w/ Special Needs
Alex is a 16-year-old boy in
the eleventh grade. He had difficulty with the development of his early
literacy skills, including the acquisition of sound/symbol relationships and
word identification, demonstrated in both his reading and writing. In the
second grade, Alex was identified as a student with specific learning
disabilities. Since then, Alex has received special education support
primarily in a resource room for language arts, while he is included in the
general education curriculum. He is able to independently read text at a
ninth grade level and continues to struggle with decoding words. Alex also
has asthma for which he takes daily medication and occasionally needs to use
an inhaler. He is a self-isolating person who does not readily join into
whole-class conversations or contribute to group learning situations. His
tendency is to sit alone at lunch and to be by himself during transitional
time. There is no in-class support for this student.
Ross is a 15 year old boy in the tenth grade, identified as a
student with ADHD in the fourth grade. He is the only child in an upper
middle class family. Both parents are professional college graduates.
They are members of the PTSA but find little time to participate
actively. Ross is a highly visual learner and his school performance as
measured by grades and test scores is uneven. Ross enjoys sports and
plays on the school baseball team. He also enjoys playing his guitar.
Ross prefers to work in small groups in class but is sometimes
disruptive.
|
4.
RATIONALE
A. Enduring Understanding
Pascal's Principle: Pressure applied to an enclosed fluid is transmitted undiminshed to every part of the fluid as well as to the walls of the container.
B. Essential Questions
How are forces transferred through a fluid? When you apply force to one part of a
fluid, how can you tell what forces will exist in other parts of the fluid?
C. Reason for Instructional Strategies
and Student Activities
The initial discrepant event demonstration is
intended to introduce the essential question while the laboratory exercise
gives student an opportunity to discover the answer to the question on the
basis of their own inquiry.
|
|
5. CONTENT STANDARD(S)
Physics Standard #3g. Students know how to solve problems
involving heat flow, work, and efficiency in a heat engine and know that all
real engines lose some heat to their surroundings
|
6. ELD STANDARD(S)
Grade 9-12 Writing
Strategies Cluster 2, I: Narrate a
sequence of events and communicate their significance to the audience.
A: Structure ideas and arguments in a given
context by giving supporting and relevant examples
|
7.
LEARNING GOAL(S) - OBJECTIVE(S)
A. Cognitive
After completing an inquiry investigation
students will be able to define the relationships between force, pressure and
work.
B. Affective
Students
will work in groups of 4 to investigate the relationships between force and
pressure.
Students
will share data via internet.
C. Psychomotor
Students
will perform laboratory operations.
D. Language Development
After
completing a laboratory investigation students will write a detailed
description of the results of that investigation with emphasis on the errors
and uncertainties inherent in the measurement techniques
|
8.
ASSESSMENT(S)
A. Diagnostic/Entry Level
Formal diagnostic assessment in the form of a
quick-write. Once the student s have
written their definitions of “pressure”
three are chosen and read aloud without identifying the authors. Ask for a show of hands to vote for the
best one.
B. Formative-Progress Monitoring
Assessment by walking around – during lab work
check for understanding.
C. Summative
Lab report with emphasis on relationship between
frictional force and force associated with pressure – how one depends on area
of plunger and other does not.
|
9A.
EXPLANATION OF DIFFERENTIATION FOR
ENGLISH
LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Since the lesson is primarily focused on group
work and written response, differentiation for ELL students will be primarily
concerned with group placement and written product
1.) Content/Based on Readiness, Learning
Profile or Interest
Each of the ELL students is given opportunity to
do the anticipatory reading in teachers presence and ask questions before and
after school. Check individually for
comprehension during walkaround.
2.) Process/Based on Readiness, Learning
Profile or Interest
Place Elena in a group with a strong on-task
leader to maintain focus. When she is
found to be lagging in content mastery encourage her to consult with other
students.
Place Ibram in a highly inclusive group and encourage
him to share content mastery with other group members or other students. It may be valuable to place him in the same
group as Elena, or another highly social student who can turn to him for help
with content mastery.
Maria, because of her youth, may struggle with
the content of this lesson. Place her
in a group with a strong and sympathetic mentor who can be expected to have
good mastery of the content and be able to communicate it to her.
3.) Product/Based on Readiness, Learning
Profile or
Interest
In all three cases emphasis is placed on
graphical presentation for assessment.
Give detailed feedback and encouragement on written product. For Maria,
allowance to be made for grammar and usage and for lack of time for homework.
|
9B.
EXPLANATION OF
DIFFERENTIATION FOR
STUDENTS
WITH SPECIAL NEEDS
1.) Content/Based on Readiness, Learning
Profile or Interest
The anticipatory
reading will be supplemented with a link to a video defining pressure (http://youtu.be/HH5ozisF_fg) and a
second link discussing Pascal’s Principle will be available at the end of the
class (http://youtu.be/YlmRa-9zDF8). Available to all students, Alex will be
encouraged to use it as a supplement to his reading and Ross because it will
appeal to him as a visual learner.
2.) Process/Based on Readiness, Learning
Profile or Interest
Since very little
written instruction is provide for this exercise the social interaction
within the small groups is very important so placing Ross and Alex in
appropriate groups will be important.
Place Alex in a highly
socially accepting group with a strong group leader and at least one member
who can be expected to master the content relatively quickly. Encourage Alex to seek assistance with any
difficulty from the rest of his group
Place Ross in a group
with at least one student who does not easily get off task. When checking in with this group, encourage
Ross to take detailed notes on the group’s work so as to help him maintain
focus.
3.) Product/Based on Readiness, Learning
Profile or Interest
Encourage both Alex and
Ross to emphasize graphical analysis and sketches to supplement the written
work on their laboratory reports
|
10. INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES
(Describe what the
teacher does. Include differentiation strategies.)
A. Anticipatory Set/Into
NOTE: This lesson plan is to be used on day 2 of
an interdisciplinary students but is only to be used for the Physics students
in the group. The Anticipatory set
will be co-taught by the Physics and Earth Science teachers using a
complementary model, while for the rest of the lesson the class will split
into Physics and Earth Science groups.
Review
vocabulary by quick-write followed by students reading their definitions.
Fracture
Hydraulic
Carbon
Footprint
Collect
homework – ask for volunteers to summarize their papers. Invite comment on summaries.
Split
into Physics and Earth Science groups.
Cartesian
Diver discrepant event. Assemble
students around teacher. Display the
apparatus, point out the diver floating inside the apparatus. Ask how to make the diver sink – receive
answers, comments. Then catch their
attention and squeeze bottle.
Magic. Ask what happened. Repeat.
The force of my squeezing the outside of the bottle is transferred to
the diver inside the bottle.
Quick-write definition of pressure. Choose 3 papers to read out. Have students vote via show of hands for
the best definition
B. Instruction/Through
Quick-write definition of pressure. Choose 3 papers to read out. Have students vote via show of hands for
the best definition
Introduction to the lab. Display a pair of syringes with tube. Make the following points.
You push on one plunger, the force is transferred
through the fluid and the other plunger moves.
“If I push on the one plunger with say 10 N of
force, how much force would I feel at the other plunger?” (allow some
discussion)
“Your job today is to measure that, and try to
discover the relationship – try to write the equation that describes the
relationship between these two.”
Point out what equipment is there.
Point out that the 2 syringes are different
diameters – so they hold different amounts of water – the smaller plunger
will move a greater distance that the smaller one. Remind them how to calculate the volume as
length times cross-sectional area – pi*r^2*l
Point out the need to account for friction: “As you get started, remember there is
friction in these plungers. There’s
some amount of force that you have to apply before the plunger will start to
move. Make sure you figure out a way
to account for it.”
Remind them that they are going to share data
(NOTE: It
is expected that by this time, students have had the experience of sharing
data with google docs. If they have
not they will need in introduction and a review of expectations.)
C. Guided/Independent Practice/Through
Release them to work on the lab. Circulate. Encourage groups that are taking
an approach which will yield results.
Give hints to groups that are not.
Groups that seem hopelessly lost, encourage them to consult with
groups that are progressing.
20 minutes before end of class start making sure
everyone is uploading their data
D. Closure
Brief reminder of the need for a clear graph and
conclusions. Particular emphasis on
the uncertainties around the presence of friction and the need for a clear
explanation of how they are dealt with.
E. Beyond
Co-teaching model: Complementary
Next class we’ll be applying the principles we developed today to the hydraulic fracturing and be able to see exactly how and why that process works. Give homework assignment |
11. STUDENT ACTIVITIES
(Describe what the
students does. Include differentiation activities.)
A. Anticipatory Set/Into
Homework completed
Watch and comment on discrepant event.
B. Instruction/Through
Listen, take notes
C. Guided/Independent Practice/Through
Work in small groups
Generate and test hypotheses – possible more than
one.
Assemble experimental apparatus & perform
tests
Access internet
D. Closure
Listen, ask questions as needed
E. Beyond
Lab report writing.
|
12.
RESOURCES
(Attach
any materials needed to implement the lesson, such as a power point
presentation, graphic organizer, reading…)
Lab
Equipment:
Syringes,
polyurethane tubing, ring stands, masses and balances.
Teachers
computer or classroom laptops for uploading data.
|
LAB REPORT RUBRIC
|
|||
Criterion
| Does not meet |
Approaches
|
Meets/Exceeds
|
Completion
|
Lab is not turned in
|
Lab is turned in late (less than 1 week) or partially complete
|
Lab is complete and on time
|
Data Sharing
|
Data is not shared
|
Shared data is uploaded after class is over
|
Shared data is uploaded during class
|
Content
|
Does not follow standard Introduction/Analysis/Conclusion form
|
Standard form is followed.
Analysis and/or conclusion contain conceptual or systematic errors
|
Standard form is followed.
Conclusions are clear and accurate.
|
Graphics
|
No graphics are included
|
Graphics are included, poorly labeled or don’t make sense
|
Graphics are clear and support conclusions
|
Form
|
Multiple errors exist, sentences are incomplete
|
Discussion is in complete sentences with few errors
|
Discussion is in complete sentences with no errors.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment